Lament for a Nation copertina

Lament for a Nation

The Defeat of Canadian Nationalism (Carleton Library Series)

Anteprima

Ascolta ora gratuitamente con il tuo abbonamento Audible

Iscriviti ora
Dopo 30 giorni (60 per i membri Prime), 9,99 €/mese. Puoi cancellare ogni mese
Ascolta senza limiti migliaia di audiolibri, podcast e serie originali
Disponibile su ogni dispositivo, anche senza connessione
9,99 € al mese. Puoi cancellare ogni mese.

Lament for a Nation

Di: George Grant, Andrew Potter
Letto da: Jonathan Watton
Iscriviti ora

Dopo 30 giorni (60 per i membri Prime), 9,99 €/mese. Cancella quando vuoi.

Acquista ora a 7,95 €

Acquista ora a 7,95 €

Canadians have relatively few binding national myths, but one of the most pervasive and enduring is the conviction that the country is doomed. In 1965 George Grant passionately defended Canadian identity by asking fundamental questions about the meaning and future of Canada’s political existence. In Lament for a Nation he argued that Canada–immense and underpopulated, defined in part by the border, history, and culture it shares with the United States, and torn by conflicting loyalties to Britain, Quebec, and America–had ceased to exist as a sovereign state. Lament for a Nation became the seminal work in Canadian political thought and Grant became known as the father of Canadian nationalism.

This edition includes a major introduction by Andrew Potter that explores Grant’s arguments in the context of changes in ethnic diversity, free trade, globalization, post-modernism, and 9/11. Potter discusses the shifting uses of the terms “liberal” and “conservative” and closes with a look at the current state of Canadian nationalism.

©1965, 1978 George P. Grant (P)2026 McGill-Queen’s University Press
Americhe Filosofia Ideologie e dottrine Politica e governo Scienze politiche Storia e teoria
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1

Recensioni della critica

Lament for a Nation should be respected as a masterpiece of political meditation … In this study Grant opened Canadian public debate, with frankness and depth, to include the most fundamental and perennial questions a nation must ask itself about the full meaning of its own political existence. He challenged us to reflect on the unique possibilities and limits constituting our destiny as Canadians.”—Peter Emberley, Carleton University

Ancora nessuna recensione