Ascolta ora gratuitamente con il tuo abbonamento Audible

Dopo 30 giorni, 9,99 €/mese. Cancella quando vuoi.
Ascolta senza limiti migliaia di audiolibri, podcast e serie originali
Disponibile su ogni dispositivo, anche senza connessione
9,99 € al mese, cancelli quando vuoi
In the Name of Security copertina

In the Name of Security

Di: Peter Goodchild
Letto da: David Hyde Pierce,Amy Pietz,John de Lancie,Full Cast
Iscriviti - Gratis i primi 30 giorni

Dopo 30 giorni, 9,99 €/mese. Cancella quando vuoi.

Acquista ora a 6,95 €

Acquista ora a 6,95 €

Paga usando carta che finisce per
Confermando il tuo acquisto, accetti le Condizioni d'Uso di Audible e ci autorizzi ad addebitare il costo del servizio sul tuo metodo di pagamento preferito o su un altro metodo di pagamento nei nostri sistemi. Per favore, consulta la nostra Informativa sulla Privacy qua.

Sintesi dell'editore

The Trials of Alger Hiss, The Trial of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, The Case of J. Robert Oppenheimer. At the height of the Cold War, American democracy was challenged by the anti-Communist atmosphere of the McCarthy era.

In the Name of Security re-opens three famous spy cases that rocked America between 1948 and 1954: Alger Hiss, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, and J. Robert Oppenheimer. Each hour-long program combines dramatic re-enactments based on original trial transcripts, archival material, new evidence, the latest assessments of American historians and scientists, and the commentaries of relatives and friends of the accused.

(P)1998 L.A. Theatre Works

Recensioni editoriali

Martin Jenkins is a seasoned BBC producer who frequently works in this country. Equally adept at documentary and radio drama - he here combines these skills, with the help of codirector John Theochari - to present docudramas on the McCarthy-era spy trials of Alger Hiss, the Rosenbergs, and J. Robert Oppenheimer. The trilogy is atypical for L. A. Theatre Works, which normally tapes its audio plays in front of a studio audience. These BBC coproductions benefit from the controlled studio conditions under which they were made. They combine reenactments with interviews of historians and eyewitnesses for heightened realism. It's difficult to single out individuals from the outstanding cast, particularly when the sense of ensemble is so strong.

Cosa pensano gli ascoltatori di In the Name of Security

Valutazione media degli utenti. Nota: solo i clienti che hanno ascoltato il titolo possono lasciare una recensione

Recensioni - seleziona qui sotto per cambiare la provenienza delle recensioni.

Non ci sono recensioni disponibili
Ordina per:
Filtra per:
  • Generale
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Lettura
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Storia
    5 out of 5 stars
Immagine del profilo di Gwynne O'Reagan
  • Gwynne O'Reagan
  • 11/08/2011

Wonderful history lesson, told with verve

As a person who grew up well after the events discussed in these three playlets, I found the information in them fascinating and new to me. The acting was excellent, as well. I was a bit puzzled by the "intent" of the author. In terms of tone, it sounded as though the listener is meant to feel sympathy for the persons involved--Hiss, the Rosenbergs, and Oppenheimer--but the facts presented do not lead in that direction. In the case of Hiss and the Rosenbergs, the narrator makes it clear that in recent years the Venona decodings have proven that they were certainly guilty of espionage, Hiss in time of war. That seems to constitute treason, which is worthy of severe penalty--including the death penalty. The Rosenbergs' crime seems even greater--what could be worse than giving atomic secrets to an enemy nation? The actors' declartions suggest that the civil rights of Hiss, the Rosenbergs, and Oppenheimer were violated, but other than citing that the "current of the time" during the "Red Scare" convicted them, rather than the evidence, I did not hear what seemed to me clear instances of violations. To my unfamiliar ears, the contemporary evidence (not Venona) sounded pretty damning, whatever the climate of the times. Oppenheimer was the only one who may have been treated roughly given his "crime," but then his punishment was simply to be removed from a job. How could a reasonable government have left in charge of such a vital defense/security program as atomic weapons a man who not only had had Communist sympathies but, much more importantly, had failed to disclose a security breach known to him personally for at least 6 months? What could the authorities have done--I mean, doesn't that constitute at least reason to doubt Oppenheimer's trustworthiness?

At any rate, as I said, I was previously unfamiliar with these cases, and I am certainly disposed now to find out a great deal more about all of them. I highly recommend the drama to anyone interested in postwar history

Hai valutato questa recensione!

Hai segnalato questa recensione!

7 persone l'hanno trovata utile

  • Generale
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Lettura
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Storia
    3 out of 5 stars
Immagine del profilo di Utente anonimo
  • Utente anonimo
  • 05/05/2015

Whitewash of misguided Communist sympathizers

Alger Hiss perjured himself. The Rosenbergs betrayed America. Oppenheimer became a security risk. But this portrayal halos their roles.

Hai valutato questa recensione!

Hai segnalato questa recensione!

4 persone l'hanno trovata utile

  • Generale
    2 out of 5 stars
  • Lettura
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Storia
    2 out of 5 stars
Immagine del profilo di T Lawrence
  • T Lawrence
  • 12/06/2020

Very lopsided story.

This entire production sounds as though a communist put it together. Anyone who would take it upon themselves to offer top secret information to a foreign country is a trader in my opinion. It should be left up to the elected officials to make decisions like this. If our elected officials believe it’s ok then let them share our national security secrets. No matter if someone has a belief that another country should have the information, we have laws in our country. Breaking these laws is always punishable. This book seems to try to influence our beliefs that giving communists our national secrets is ok if we want to. This book seems to be written by a communist sympathizer.

Hai valutato questa recensione!

Hai segnalato questa recensione!

1 persona l'ha trovata utile

  • Generale
    out of 5 stars
Immagine del profilo di Kelley
  • Kelley
  • 19/02/2007

Haunting

It's a fascinating story expertly presented.

Hai valutato questa recensione!

Hai segnalato questa recensione!

1 persona l'ha trovata utile

Ordina per:
Filtra per:
  • Generale
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Lettura
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Storia
    5 out of 5 stars
Immagine del profilo di Stafford Steve
  • Stafford Steve
  • 24/05/2020

Excellent documentary-drama

Three classic cases from early Cold War America that explore how legitimate concerns for Soviet espionage were often hijacked for domestic political agendas.

Hai valutato questa recensione!

Hai segnalato questa recensione!