Vantaggi dell'abbonamento Vantaggi dell'abbonamento
  • Accedi ad un universo di contenuti audio, senza limiti d'ascolto.
  • Ascolta dove vuoi, quando vuoi, anche offline.
  • Dopo i primi 30 giorni gratis l’iscrizione si rinnova automaticamente a EUR 9,99 al mese.
  • Cancella la tua iscrizione in ogni momento.

Sintesi dell'editore

Want to be immortal? You can be in AD 2110. Just go to the Hereafter Insurance Corporation and hook yourself up to the Machine. There’s nothing to fear. That is, if it happens to be working right, and if nobody slips another mind into your body when you’re not looking, and if you’re not on a poltergeist hatelist…

First published in 1959 as a startling, revolutionary novel of the future—then pushed to new cinematic limits as the feature film adaptation Freejack in 1992—Robert Sheckley’s unsettling vision of tomorrow is a trenchantly witty novel of a future where everything has improved except the bumbling human race, which just can’t let itself enjoy a good thing when it finally gets it.

Thomas Blaine awoke in a white bed in a white room and heard someone say, “He’s alive now.” Then they asked him his name, age, and marital status. Yes, that seemed normal enough—but what was this talk about “death trauma”?

Thus was Thomas Blaine introduced to the year 2110, when science had discovered the technique of transferring a man’s consciousness from one body to another, when a man’s mind could be snatched from the past, as his body was at the point of death, and brought forward into a “host body” in this fantastic future world.

But that was only a small part of it, for the future had proved the reality of life after death and discovered worlds beyond or simultaneous with our own—worlds where, through scientific techniques, a man could live again, in another body, when he died here—and had in the process established the reality of ghosts, poltergeists, and zombies.

What did it all mean? How had this discovery of what they called the “hereafter” shaped the world of 2110?

Thomas Blaine found himself living in a future where the discoveries and techniques imagined by people of his time, though realized, were completely overwhelmed by discoveries no one had ever dreamed of.

©1959 Robert Sheckley (P)2011 Blackstone Audio, Inc.

Praise for Robert Sheckley: “Sheckley has long been considered one of the genre’s leading humorists.” (New York Times Book Review)

Cosa ne pensano gli iscritti

Non ci sono recensioni disponibili
Ordina per:
  • Totali
  • Interpretazione
  • Storia
  • Niels J. Rasmussen
  • 14 05 2014

Sheckley Is The Best There Is

Any additional comments?

When it comes to science-fiction authors you have never heard of, there are none more talented than Robert Sheckley. Aside from "Immortality Inc.", (which is amazing), his novel "Dimension of Miracles" & as well as a handful of short-stories adapted into radio dramas for the 1950's program "X-Minus One" have earned him the honor of owning the spot in my heart as my favorite obscure writer.

"Immortality Inc." plays with your mind only the way that Sheckley can. The story itself blends ideas from subjects such as time travel, the afterlife, immorality, reincarnation, and zombie folklore into ONE book that reads like a "I-can't-put-it-down" page-turner. I also found it interesting that a book which was written over 50 years ago had its protagonist be a self-proclaimed atheist. Rare for that time period in fiction.

Definitely worth the credit. You won't be sorry.

9.4 / 10

10 su 10 utenti hanno ritenuto utile questa recensione

  • Totali
  • Interpretazione
  • Storia
  • ESK
  • 22 07 2012


If you could sum up Immortality, Inc. in three words, what would they be?

Dystopian, futuristic, anti-religious

What other book might you compare Immortality, Inc. to and why?

We by Zamyatin, 1984 by Orwell or Brave New World by Huxley where gloomy and frightening alternative futures come to life.

What does Bronson Pinchot bring to the story that you wouldn’t experience if you just read the book?

That's the power of his voice, the way he can easily vary his pitch, his voice quality...all sounded perfect to me.

6 su 6 utenti hanno ritenuto utile questa recensione

  • Totali
  • Interpretazione
  • Storia
  • Gem
  • 15 10 2014

Overpowering bad performance

What disappointed you about Immortality, Inc.?

The performance.

Would you be willing to try another book from Robert Sheckley? Why or why not?

I don't see why not. Only if it is someone else performing the book. The story has interesting elements.

What didn’t you like about Bronson Pinchot’s performance?

His voices... The voices he does for the characters are so terrible and distracting that it lowers the quality of the dialogue and ruins the character.

You didn’t love this book... but did it have any redeeming qualities?

The ideas presented were indeed interesting and had a good amount of backing and explanation to them.

Any additional comments?

The performance is really, truly terrible.

2 su 2 utenti hanno ritenuto utile questa recensione

  • Totali
  • Interpretazione
  • Storia
  • Nancy
  • 17 10 2014

Gripping but did not care for ending.

Would you recommend this book to a friend? Why or why not?

I would recommend the book for its compelling ideas.

Could you see Immortality, Inc. being made into a movie or a TV series? Who should the stars be?

I think it could adapt to a tv show but might loose to much in the translation.

Any additional comments?

I liked the basic idea, I did not have a problem with the performance at all. I was not satisfied with the ending but won't go into reasons why since that's spoiler territory.

1 su 1 utenti hanno ritenuto utile questa recensione

  • Totali
  • Interpretazione
  • Storia
  • Kazimir
  • 11 02 2016

Amazing story

Robert Sheckley had an amazing talent of good story telling. This particular one combines action, drama and even some deeply philosophical wanderings about spiritual vs bodily life. The unabridged novel is much deeper than its screen adaptation Freejack (1992).

  • Totali
  • Interpretazione
  • Storia
  • Amazon Customer
  • 27 12 2015

Not what I had hoped.

I was hoping for funny, clever and inventive. But the writer wasnt talented enough to create a female character who was more than a marionette. The story didnt drag nor build. The climax really wasnt. Not so bad that I didnt listen all the way thru, but at the end I thought, "Really? That's it?"

  • Totali
  • Interpretazione
  • Storia
  • Mario
  • 06 05 2015

Really takes your thinking to a new level

What did you love best about Immortality, Inc.?

Great story and put future technology in light with running corporations and such. Very interesting and well thought out.