Send us Fan Mail

The most dangerous fundraising assumption in private markets might be the most common one: the goal is to raise as much as you possibly can. We challenge that reflex and dig into why “bigger fund, bigger win” can quietly turn into weaker returns, more risk, and a harder future raise. If you’re a GP planning a fundraise or an LP evaluating a manager’s strategy capacity, this is a perspective shift worth sitting with.

We talk about the underappreciated craft of right-sizing a fundraise: matching fund size to a real opportunity set, not to ambition or optics. When a fund raises more than its strategy can absorb, the pressure to deploy shows up fast. You either sit on uninvested capital that drags performance, or you stretch into deals that don’t truly fit the thesis. That’s how underwriting standards slip, thesis drift starts, and track records get damaged.

We also explore why raising a disciplined amount can be a counterintuitive credibility signal with sophisticated and institutional LPs. Being able to explain your limits, your deal pacing, and the true capacity of your strategy signals maturity and process. Finally, we connect the dots to long-term franchise building: a strong, well-executed fund at the right size can set up a larger second fund, while an over-sized fund that underdelivers can make the next raise an uphill battle. If this resonated, subscribe, share it with a manager or allocator you respect, and leave a review with your take on what “right-sized” looks like.