The Screening Gap: Why Most Mothers Fall Through the Cracks copertina

The Screening Gap: Why Most Mothers Fall Through the Cracks

The Screening Gap: Why Most Mothers Fall Through the Cracks

Ascolta gratuitamente

Vedi i dettagli del titolo

3 mesi a soli 0,99 €/mese

Dopo 3 mesi, 9,99 €/mese. Si applicano termini e condizioni.

A proposito di questo titolo

What if improving perinatal mental health outcomes started not with treatment, but with asking the right questions — consistently and with a plan? And what if the real problem isn’t lack of evidence, but hesitation, fear, and vague guidelines?

In this episode of The Science Chick Report, Dr. Kathleen Kendall-Tackett focuses on one of the most essential yet neglected aspects of perinatal care: screening and assessment. This session explains why screening matters, why providers often avoid it, and what must be in place before screening can be effective.

Dr. Kendall-Tackett breaks down common barriers — limited time, fear of “opening Pandora’s box,” lack of training, and uncertainty about next steps — and shows why relying on clinical judgment alone consistently fails to identify depression, anxiety, and PTSD. She contrasts vague U.S. screening recommendations with more specific international guidelines and highlights how poor implementation leads to missed opportunities for care.

This episode reframes screening not as diagnosis, but as a gateway to support. For healthcare providers, community organizations, and anyone working with pregnant or postpartum women, it offers a practical, evidence-based case for why assessment must be intentional, planned, and followed by clear action.


In This Episode:

  • [00:00:00] Introduction and why perinatal screening matters

  • [00:01:12] Screening vs. diagnosis: a critical distinction

  • [00:02:29] Why most new mothers are never screened

  • [00:03:11] Time constraints and real-world provider barriers

  • [00:04:41] Why screening without a follow-up plan fails

  • [00:08:06] Why providers miss depression without standardized tools

  • [00:10:05] U.S. vs. UK screening guidelines

  • [00:12:07] The “Pandora’s box” myth and institutional resistance

  • [00:13:15] Screening as an equity issue

  • [00:15:00] Pediatric settings as a missed screening opportunity

  • [00:21:00] Obstetric screening guidelines and persistent gaps

  • [00:26:41] What actually increases screening compliance


Notable Quotes:

  • [01:34] “Screening is the first step. You can’t treat what you don’t identify.” — Dr. Kathleen Kendall-Tackett

  • [02:52] “Most healthcare providers never screen the millions of women who give birth each year.” — Dr. Kathleen Kendall-Tackett

  • [04:41] “It’s useless to screen if there isn’t a plan for what happens next.” — Dr. Kathleen Kendall-Tackett

  • [08:06] “Providers are spectacularly bad at identifying depression without a measure.” — Dr. Kathleen Kendall-Tackett

  • [14:06] “Women who were screened were six times more likely to receive counseling.” — Dr. Kathleen Kendall-Tackett


Resource and Links

The Science Chick Report

  • The Science Chick Report

Dr. Kathleen Kendall-Tackett

  • Website

  • LinkedIn

  • X

  • Facebook

  • ResearchGate (upcoming paper)

Mentioned

  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2013) – Screening strategies

  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists – Perinatal screening guidance

  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK) – Screening recommendations

  • Lain et al. (2022) – Provider resistance to screening

  • Declercq et al. (2021) – Listening to Mothers in California

  • Rafferty et al. (2019) – AAP maternal mental health policy

  • Statistics Canada (2019) – Postpartum depression prevalence

  • Kim et al. (2009) – Obstetric screening practices

Ancora nessuna recensione