Bad Leadership: How the Soviet Union Punished Truth and Starved Its Own Scientists
Impossibile aggiungere al carrello
Rimozione dalla Lista desideri non riuscita.
Non è stato possibile aggiungere il titolo alla Libreria
Non è stato possibile seguire il Podcast
Esecuzione del comando Non seguire più non riuscita
-
Letto da:
-
Di:
A proposito di questo titolo
This episode explores a devastating leadership failure through the life and death of Nikolai Vavilov, a scientist who tried to prevent famine—and was destroyed by a system that decided truth should answer to power.
After the Russian Revolution, the Soviet Union faced repeated agricultural collapse. Vavilov believed the solution wasn’t slogans or speed, but diversity: collecting thousands of seed varieties from around the world to protect against crop failure. His work built the largest seed bank on earth and laid the foundation for modern agricultural science.
But Vavilov’s careful, evidence-based leadership collided with ideology. Trofim Lysenko promised fast results aligned with political doctrine, rejecting genetics as “bourgeois” science. His claims offered certainty, obedience, and ideological comfort—exactly what leadership under Joseph Stalin wanted to hear.
We break down how bad leadership decisions, decision-making failure, and fear-driven governance turned disagreement into treason. Vavilov was arrested, imprisoned, and left to starve—while Lysenko rose to power, silencing critics and setting Soviet agriculture back decades.
This episode examines how organizational failure occurs when leaders reward certainty over accuracy, loyalty over evidence, and confidence over humility. The tragedy wasn’t scientific error—it was leadership choosing ideology over reality.
If you’re interested in leadership mistakes, ethical leadership, decision-making under pressure, and how institutions collapse when truth becomes subordinate to authority, the story of Nikolai Vavilov offers one of the starkest lessons of the 20th century.
Learn why leaders fail—not because they reject data, but because they punish those who bring it.