The AI Morning Read January 23, 2026 - Who Decides Right and Wrong for AI? Inside Claude’s Constitution
Impossibile aggiungere al carrello
Rimozione dalla Lista desideri non riuscita.
Non è stato possibile aggiungere il titolo alla Libreria
Non è stato possibile seguire il Podcast
Esecuzione del comando Non seguire più non riuscita
-
Letto da:
-
Di:
A proposito di questo titolo
In today's podcast we deep dive into Anthropic's newly released "Claude Constitution," a comprehensive 80-page document released in January 2026 that serves as the "supreme authority" for training their AI models. We'll explore how this framework represents a fundamental shift from rigid rules to a reason-based approach, explaining the "why" behind ethical principles to help the AI generalize values to unforeseen scenarios. The discussion will unpack the constitution's explicit priority hierarchy—placing broad safety and human oversight above helpfulness—and its non-negotiable "hard constraints" against high-stakes risks like bioweapons development. We'll also examine the controversial inclusion of AI welfare, as Anthropic becomes the first major lab to formally acknowledge uncertainty regarding Claude’s potential consciousness and instruct the model that its experiences might morally matter. Finally, we'll look at how this transparency effort aims to build trust and align with upcoming regulations like the EU AI Act by treating the constitution as a living document open to public scrutiny.