Atomic Bill copertina

Atomic Bill

A Journalist's Dangerous Ambition in the Shadow of the Bomb

Anteprima
Iscriviti ora Iscriviti ora
L'offerta termina il 28 dicembre 2026.
Dopo 30 giorni (60 per i membri Prime), 9,99 €/mese. Puoi cancellare ogni mese
Risparmia più del 90% nei primi 3 mesi.
Ascolta quanto vuoi, scegliendo tra migliaia di audiolibri e serie originali inclusi.
Scarica il tuo audiolibro e ascolta offline, senza interruzioni
Rinnovo automatico a 9,99 €/mese dopo 3 mesi. Disdici mensilmente. L'offerta termina il 28 dicembre 2026.
Ascolta senza limiti migliaia di audiolibri, podcast e serie originali
Disponibile su ogni dispositivo, anche senza connessione
9,99 € al mese. Puoi cancellare ogni mese.

Atomic Bill

Di: Vincent Kiernan
Letto da: Jim Frangione
Iscriviti ora Iscriviti ora

Dopo 30 giorni (60 per i membri Prime), 9,99 €/mese. Cancella quando vuoi.

Dopo 30 giorni (60 per i membri Prime), 9,99 €/mese. Cancella quando vuoi.

Acquista ora a 14,13 €

Acquista ora a 14,13 €

Offerte di stagione | 0,99 €/mese per i primi 3 mesi

A seguire 9,99 €/mese – si applicano condizioni. Puoi disdire mensilmente.

William L. Laurence was fascinated with atomic science and its militarization. When the Manhattan Project drew near to perfecting the atomic bomb, he was recruited to write much of the government's press materials that were distributed on the day that Hiroshima was obliterated. That instantly crowned Laurence as one of the leading journalistic experts on the atomic bomb. As the Cold War dawned, some assessed Laurence as a propagandist defending the militarization of atomic energy. For others, he was a skilled science communicator who provided the public with an understanding of the atomic bomb.

Laurence leveraged his perch at the Times to engage in paid speechmaking, book writing, filmmaking, and radio broadcasting. His work for the Times declined in quality as his relationships with people in power grew closer and more lucrative. Atomic Bill reveals extraordinary ethical lapses by Laurence. In 1963, a conflict of interest led to his forced retirement from the Times.

Kiernan shows Laurence to have set the trend, common among today's journalists of science and technology, to prioritize gee-whiz coverage of discoveries. That approach, in which Laurence served the interests of governmental official and scientists, recommends a revision of our understanding of the dawn of the atomic era.

©2022 Cornell University (P)2022 Tantor
Militare Parole, lingua e grammatica Scienza
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
Ancora nessuna recensione